HKServerSolution/Cera洛杉矶VDS评测/高配做站



  • 有关此台小鸡的 off 信息及购买地址, 请查看 这里

    业务需要,找 HKServerSolution 的老板 py 来了台 VDS. 这里顺便出一个评测。
    老板给我开的是 Cera 洛杉矶的 VDS, 配置是 2 核心 2G 内存。这个配置他们好像没有在卖。他们在卖的最低配是 4 核心 4G 内存。

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    CPU model            : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2673 v3 @ 2.40GHz
    Number of cores      : 2
    CPU frequency        : 2398.608 MHz
    Total size of Disk   : 25.0 GB (8.6 GB Used)
    Total amount of Mem  : 1838 MB (307 MB Used)
    Total amount of Swap : 2047 MB (94 MB Used)
    System uptime        : 1 days, 22 hour 5 min
    Load average         : 0.00, 0.01, 0.05
    OS                   : CentOS 7.5.1804
    Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
    Kernel               : 3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.x86_64
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    I/O speed(1st run)   : 167 MB/s
    I/O speed(2nd run)   : 133 MB/s
    I/O speed(3rd run)   : 136 MB/s
    Average I/O speed    : 145.3 MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download Speed
    CacheFly                        205.234.175.175         9.20MB/s      
    Linode, Tokyo, JP               106.187.96.148          5.20MB/s      
    Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            4.03MB/s      
    Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           8.35MB/s      
    Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           8.17MB/s      
    Linode, Fremont, CA             50.116.14.9             8.18MB/s      
    Softlayer, Dallas, TX           173.192.68.18           6.43MB/s      
    Softlayer, Seattle, WA          67.228.112.250          7.67MB/s      
    Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            4.11MB/s      
    Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           5.50MB/s      
    Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          4.37MB/s      
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    

    CPU 跑分:

    ========================================================================
       BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
    
       System: cloud.com: GNU/Linux
       OS: GNU/Linux -- 3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.x86_64 -- #1 SMP Wed May 9 18:05:47 UTC 2018
       Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
       Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
       CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2673 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4797.2 bogomips)
              x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
       CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2673 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4797.2 bogomips)
              x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
       15:13:57 up  4:47,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.05; runlevel 3
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Wed Oct 24 2018 15:13:57 - 15:42:03
    2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables       30937407.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone                     3877.6 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput                               2163.7 lps   (29.6 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        575209.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          151969.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1612329.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput                              845177.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 123346.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation                               7846.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   5174.5 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1138.7 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead                         823217.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    
    System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   30937407.9   2651.0
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3877.6    705.0
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2163.7    503.2
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     575209.4   1452.5
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     151969.7    918.2
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1612329.0   2779.9
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     845177.9    679.4
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     123346.4    308.4
    Process Creation                                126.0       7846.8    622.8
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       5174.5   1220.4
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1138.7   1897.8
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0     823217.6    548.8
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score                                         955.4
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Wed Oct 24 2018 15:42:03 - 16:10:09
    2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables       62585078.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone                     7848.9 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput                               5374.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        999381.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          260279.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2724650.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput                             1735047.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 251985.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation                              16537.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   8611.7 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1198.5 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead                        1508478.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    
    System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   62585078.9   5362.9
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       7848.9   1427.1
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0       5374.5   1249.9
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     999381.8   2523.7
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     260279.6   1572.7
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2724650.6   4697.7
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1735047.6   1394.7
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     251985.6    630.0
    Process Creation                                126.0      16537.8   1312.5
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       8611.7   2031.1
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1198.5   1997.6
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1508478.3   1005.7
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1752.5
    
    
    
    ======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= 
    

    这个结果个人感觉还是比较高的

    运营商 去程 回程
    中国电信 163骨干网 163骨干网
    中国联通 163骨干网 GTT
    中国移动 移动骨干网 移动骨干网
    中国铁通 移动骨干网 移动骨干网

    注:好像所有移动都走广州出口,联通都到广州走电信,回程走 GTT. 铁通走广州出口,走移动骨干网。另外据大佬说,到联通的速度会略慢。


  • 管理员

    可以把站放上来看看



  • @halulu 站开了中国大陆的 CDN 的。。。我觉得效果看不太出来



友情链接:哈陆lu的博客 WebSocks 主机博客 Mr.Kevin 逗比根据地

本论坛所有内容除特殊注明均为原创。除作者特殊要求外,本站所有内容采用知识共享署名 4.0 国际许可协议进行许可。
知识共享许可协议