RivenCloud/荷兰阿姆斯特丹小鸡评测
-
国人商家 RivenCloud 最近上线了荷兰阿姆斯特丹的小鸡，还是 xtom 机房的。这里来评测下。原 offer 在 这里
测速请前往 https://sa.net/speedtest/
配置
基础配置
配置 详情 CPU 型号 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 0 @ 2.70GHz CPU 核心数 2 CPU 主频 2693.508 MHz 总磁盘大小 15.0 GB 总内存大小 989 MB 总 Swap 大小 1023 MB
IO
序数 | IO
1 | 300 MB/s
2 | 491 MB/s
3 | 395 MB/s
平均 | 395.3 MB/sUnixBench
======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: s9478.sa.net: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.9.127-32.el7.x86_64 -- #1 SMP Mon Sep 17 13:40:58 UTC 2018 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 0 @ 2.70GHz (5387.0 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 0 @ 2.70GHz (5387.0 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET 00:39:14 up 1 day, 21:14, 1 user, load average: 0.30, 0.07, 0.02; runlevel 5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Mon Feb 11 2019 00:39:14 - 01:07:16 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 27667143.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3275.6 MWIPS (10.3 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 917.4 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 371458.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 97659.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1143968.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 604765.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 42533.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 3742.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2661.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 888.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 573169.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 27667143.2 2370.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3275.6 595.6 Execl Throughput 43.0 917.4 213.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 371458.1 938.0 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 97659.6 590.1 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1143968.0 1972.4 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 604765.5 486.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 42533.0 106.3 Process Creation 126.0 3742.4 297.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2661.4 627.7 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 888.4 1480.7 System Call Overhead 15000.0 573169.0 382.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 590.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Mon Feb 11 2019 01:07:16 - 01:35:39 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 57614030.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 6696.2 MWIPS (10.3 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4535.4 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 656146.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 184080.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2030826.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1203076.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 153751.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 9338.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6900.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1000.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1122341.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 57614030.6 4936.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6696.2 1217.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 4535.4 1054.7 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 656146.6 1656.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 184080.0 1112.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2030826.6 3501.4 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1203076.1 967.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 153751.6 384.4 Process Creation 126.0 9338.8 741.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6900.9 1627.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1000.5 1667.5 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1122341.1 748.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1298.1 ======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======唔，单核有点低了。如果双核一起看的话，还好。
IP
分的 IP 是荷兰的
网络
路由
运营商 去程 回程 中国电信 163 骨干网 163 骨干网 中国联通 telia 绕美 level3 绕美 中国移动 telia 走德国 电信 163 骨干网
上海电信回程
跳数 IP 延迟 备注 1 185.255.55.3 0.77 ms AS3214 Netherlands North Holland Amsterdam xtom.com 2 62.133.32.9 0.53 ms AS3214 Netherlands North Holland Amsterdam xtom.com 3 81.173.18.5 2.55 ms AS4134 Europe Regions cteurope.net 4 202.97.52.17 243.59 ms AS4134 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom 5 202.97.91.189 247.05 ms AS4134 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom 6 202.97.91.13 319.46 ms AS4134 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom 7 113.96.4.142 238.49 ms AS58466 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom 8 * 9 121.14.60.118 248.46 ms AS58466 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom 10 * 11 * 12 * 13 182.254.127.120 247.94 ms AS45090 China Shanghai tencent.com ChinaTelecom
上海联通回程
跳数 IP 延迟 备注 1 185.255.55.3 0.78 ms AS3214 Netherlands North Holland Amsterdam xtom.com 2 62.133.32.9 4.24 ms AS3214 Netherlands North Holland Amsterdam xtom.com 3 9-1-27.ear3.amsterdam1.level3.net (212.72.47.105) 529.58 ms AS3356 Netherlands North Holland Amsterdam level3.com 4 ae-1-8.edge1.sanjose3.level3.net (4.69.209.165) 143.12 ms AS3356 United States California San Jose level3.com 5 4.53.209.78 311.72 ms AS3356 United States California San Jose level3.com 6 219.158.97.181 293.06 ms AS4837 China Shanghai ChinaUnicom 7 219.158.113.138 294.35 ms AS4837 China Shanghai ChinaUnicom 8 219.158.113.105 287.83 ms AS4837 China Shanghai ChinaUnicom 9 * 10 139.226.203.86 308.82 ms AS17621 China Shanghai ChinaUnicom 11 140.206.240.142 292.74 ms AS17621 China Shanghai ChinaUnicom 12 140.206.244.241 289.77 ms AS17621 China Shanghai ChinaUnicom
合肥移动回程
跳数 IP 延迟 备注 1 185.255.55.3 0.85 ms AS3214 Netherlands North Holland Amsterdam xtom.com 2 62.133.32.9 0.37 ms AS3214 Netherlands North Holland Amsterdam xtom.com 3 81.173.18.5 2.49 ms AS4134 Europe Regions cteurope.net 4 202.97.95.193 175.34 ms AS4134 China ChinaTelecom 5 202.97.91.49 202.90 ms AS4134 China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 6 202.97.94.238 242.28 ms AS4134 China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 7 202.97.92.6 223.37 ms AS4134 China Jiangsu Nanjing ChinaTelecom 8 * 9 221.183.54.125 260.90 ms AS9808 China Jiangsu Nanjing ChinaMobile 10 221.176.22.45 272.07 ms AS9808 China Jiangsu Wuxi ChinaMobile 11 * 12 * 13 * 14 * 15 * 16 112.29.133.129 288.87 ms AS9808 China Anhui Hefei ChinaMobile
山东电信去程 MTR
下载速度（未开启 BBR）
国外（IPv4）
节点名 下载速度 CacheFly 11.5MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 4.30MB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 4.02MB/s Linode, London, UK 11.6MB/s Linode, Frankfurt, DE 11.5MB/s Linode, Fremont, CA 5.54MB/s Softlayer, Dallas, TX 3.08MB/s Softlayer, Seattle, WA 5.97MB/s Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 11.6MB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 2.18MB/s Softlayer, HongKong, CN 2.42MB/s 欧美速度看起来可以
国外（IPv6）
节点名 下载速度 Linode, Atlanta, GA 15.7MB/s Linode, Dallas, TX 18.4MB/s Linode, Newark, NJ 25.9MB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 3.28MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 27.0KB/s Softlayer, San Jose, CA 7.27MB/s Softlayer, Washington, WA 19.5MB/s Softlayer, Paris, FR 54.7MB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 9.61MB/s Softlayer, Tokyo, JP 4.17MB/s 速度算是可以。不过有些好像上不去的样子
国内测速（SpeedTest-CLI）
Speedtest-CLI 的测速结果与实际速度可能存在较大差异，请参考使用。
上海联通
上海移动
移动用户看起来需要慎重考虑，，，
南京电信
SpeedTest 山东电信100M 不开 BBR 2019/Feb/11 22:05
Fast.com 山东电信100M 不开 BBR 2019/Feb/11 22:05
Youtube 山东电信100M 不开 BBR 2019/Feb/11 22:09
SpeedTest 山东电信100M 开启 BBR 2019/Feb/12
可以看 Netlix~
